Russia’s Oreshnik Missiles Challenge NATO’s Strategic Defense Plans

NATO logo and Russian flag painted on brick wall.

Russia’s new Oreshnik hypersonic missile system threatens to reshape NATO’s defense strategy as the weapon proves capable of evading Western air defenses and delivering conventional strikes with nuclear-like devastation.

Key Takeaways

  • Russia’s Oreshnik missile travels at Mach 10-11 speeds, making it virtually impossible for current NATO defense systems to intercept
  • The missile can carry conventional or nuclear warheads with a range capable of striking any European target from Russian territory
  • NATO’s concentrated air bases and F-35 fighters are particularly vulnerable to the Oreshnik’s devastating strike capabilities
  • Military experts recommend dispersing NATO aircraft across remote European locations as a countermeasure against this emerging threat
  • Russia plans to deploy the Oreshnik system in Belarus by late 2025, further increasing pressure on NATO’s eastern flank

Putin Unveils Game-Changing Missile Technology

Russia deployed its hypersonic Oreshnik missile for the first time in combat on November 21, targeting a military facility in Dnipro, Ukraine. The medium-range ballistic missile system, based on Russia’s RS-26 Rubezh ICBM, represents a significant escalation in Russia’s conventional strike capabilities. With speeds reaching Mach 10-11 and a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers, the missile can theoretically target any location in Europe while evading current missile defense systems.

Russian President Vladimir Putin named the missile “Oreshnik,” Russian for “hazelnut tree,” and has made bold claims about its destructive power. The missile features six warheads, each carrying six submunitions, delivering explosive force equivalent to tons of conventional explosives. This configuration allows the weapon to cause widespread destruction across multiple targets in a single strike, making it particularly threatening to military installations.

Strategic Implications for NATO Defense

Military expert Decker Eveleth has identified the Oreshnik as particularly problematic for NATO’s operational readiness. The missile gives Russia significant non-nuclear options to disrupt NATO operations, potentially reducing reliance on nuclear weapons while still maintaining strategic leverage. This expanded conventional capability creates new challenges for NATO planners, who must now account for Russia’s ability to strike critical infrastructure with unprecedented precision and force.

“The good news is that Oreshnik’s conventional capabilities will give Russia more non-nuclear options, theoretically reducing the risk that the Kremlin will consider using nuclear weapons early in a conflict. The bad news is that Oreshnik’s non-nuclear capabilities mean Russia will have more options to significantly disrupt NATO operations at the conventional level,” says Decker Eveleth, associate research analyst at The Center for Naval Analyses, or CNA.

NATO’s vulnerability stems largely from its reliance on sophisticated fighter jets like the F-35, which require advanced air bases for maintenance and operations. Decades of budget cuts have concentrated NATO air forces at a limited number of these facilities, creating prime targets for Oreshnik strikes. The missile’s ability to penetrate underground bunkers “three, four or more floors down,” as Putin claimed, further jeopardizes NATO’s command and control infrastructure.

Putin’s Warning and NATO’s Response Options

Putin has framed the Oreshnik as a direct response to Western countries allowing Ukraine to use longer-range weapons against Russian territory. “We believe that we have the right to use our weapons against military facilities of the countries that allow to use their weapons against our facilities,” Putin stated, describing Russia as “practically on the edge of having no need to use nuclear weapons.” This rhetoric, combined with Russia’s revised nuclear doctrine lowering the threshold for nuclear weapon use, signals an increasingly aggressive posture.

“Modern fighter jets—the F-35, which many NATO nations are increasingly using as their multirole aircraft of choice—are too complex to be field repaired. The F-35 and similar aircraft were designed to be operated from large, advanced air bases. Decades of budget cuts have concentrated NATO air forces in just a few of these bases, making them particularly vulnerable to Oreshnik-type missiles,” said Eveleth.

Countermeasures suggested by military analysts include dispersing NATO aircraft across remote locations throughout Europe to reduce vulnerability. Regular cross-service maintenance exercises are also recommended to ensure operational readiness without reliance on major bases. These adaptations would require significant changes to NATO’s current force posture and logistics planning, potentially at considerable expense.

Future Deployments and Production Capabilities

Russia plans to deploy the Oreshnik system in Belarus by the second half of 2025, according to military sources. This deployment would position the missile system closer to NATO’s eastern flank, reducing warning time for potential strikes and further complicating defensive preparations. The Russian Defense Minister has indicated that Russia is preparing for a potential armed conflict with NATO in Europe within the next decade, suggesting continued investment in systems like Oreshnik.

U.S. officials have noted that Russia currently possesses a limited number of these missiles, suggesting they won’t be used regularly against Ukraine. However, Russia is reportedly expanding missile production facilities, potentially increasing its arsenal of conventional ballistic missiles like Oreshnik. This production capability, combined with the missile’s demonstrated effectiveness, presents a long-term strategic challenge that will require sustained investment in countermeasures from NATO and its allies.

Sources:

  1. https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/spotlights/2024/russia-has-used-its-hypersonic-oreshnik-missile-for-the-first-time-what-are-its-capabilities/
  2. https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-intercontinental-missile-war-putin-d50183ccfc28b10c71e93f3e68159a61
  3. https://rmx.news/russia/military-expert-says-putins-new-weapon-is-bad-news-for-nato/
  4. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/03/17/russia-missile-nato-oreshnik-ukraine-war-conventional-weapons/