How Funding Cuts Affect Election Cybersecurity Efforts

Man with headset working at computer, holographic icons.

Trump administration cuts $10 million for election cybersecurity programs, leaving state officials scrambling to protect voting systems as November approaches.

Key Takeaways

The Trump administration has halted approximately $10 million in annual funding for two major election cybersecurity programs operated by the Center for Internet Security.
This defunding affects the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center, which provides crucial cyber intelligence to state and local election offices.
Over a dozen CISA staff members have been placed on administrative leave amid a broader review of the agency’s election-related work.
State election officials from Minnesota and Maine have expressed concern about losing these critical security resources.
The funding cuts come at a time when election systems face sophisticated cyber threats, with no permanent CISA director nominated.

Critical Election Security Programs Lose Federal Support

The Trump administration has halted federal funding for two major cybersecurity programs that provided crucial protection for state and local election systems. This decision has withdrawn approximately $10 million annually that supported the nonprofit Center for Internet Security’s efforts to secure election infrastructure. The affected programs include the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center, which provided cyber threat intelligence and incident response support to election offices nationwide.

As part of this funding shift, the administration has placed over a dozen staff members at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on administrative leave. This action is part of a broader internal review of CISA’s election-related work that administration officials have indicated is not intended for public release. The agency, established in 2018, is responsible for securing critical infrastructure, including voting systems, but currently lacks a permanent director as President Trump has not yet nominated one.

State Officials Voice Concerns Over Security Gaps

State election officials who relied on these programs for cybersecurity support have expressed alarm about the sudden funding cuts. The National Association of Secretaries of State has formally requested clarification on how these changes will impact election security efforts. Many states lack the resources to replace these federal programs with equivalent protections, creating potential vulnerabilities as the November elections approach.

“We got a lot out of it,” Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon stated regarding the now-defunded cybersecurity programs.

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows highlighted the value of these initiatives in countering cyber threats during the last presidential election. She criticized the elimination of these programs as both inefficient and dangerous, given the sophistication of current cyber threats targeting election systems. Despite the challenges, Bellows asserted, “We will find a way to protect our elections,” though the path forward remains unclear for many state election offices now working with reduced federal support.

Election Security Experts Warn of Increased Vulnerabilities

Security experts have warned that without these federally funded programs, state and local election systems may become more vulnerable to cyberattacks. CISA has faced criticism from Republicans for its past efforts to counter misinformation about the 2020 election and COVID-19 pandemic, which some observers suggest may have influenced the current funding decisions. The review comes at a critical time as states prepare for the 2024 presidential election cycle.

“This is a grave concern for state and local election officials and for the security of our elections going forward,” said Larry Norden of the Brennan Center for Justice, echoing concerns from election officials across the country.

The funding cuts arrive as intelligence agencies have identified continued foreign interest in influencing U.S. elections through various means, including cyberattacks on election infrastructure. Without federal support, the burden of securing these systems falls primarily on state and local officials, who now must seek alternative resources to maintain election security standards established over recent years.