Conditional Release Of Cannibal Killer Sparks Outrage And Pushback

Close-up of a blue eye with intricate patterns.

Connecticut’s decision to conditionally release a man who committed a gruesome cannibalistic murder has sparked outrage and raised concerns about public safety.

Key Takeaways

Tyree Smith, found not guilty by reason of insanity for a 2012 cannibalistic murder, has been granted conditional release from a psychiatric hospital.
GOP lawmakers and the victim’s family have strongly criticized the decision, calling it “outrageous” and a threat to public safety.
Psychiatrists claim Smith’s schizophrenia and substance disorders are in remission due to treatment.
Smith’s release involves strict supervision and ongoing treatment, with initial day passes on hospital grounds.
The case highlights the complex balance between mental health recovery and ensuring public safety.

Controversial Release of ‘Cannibal Killer’ Shocks Connecticut

In a decision that has sent shockwaves through Connecticut, Tyree Smith, a man once accused of a horrific cannibalistic murder, has been granted conditional release from Whiting Forensic Hospital. Smith was initially confined for 60 years after being found not guilty by reason of insanity for the 2012 murder of Angel Gonzalez, where he allegedly consumed parts of the victim’s body.

The Connecticut Psychiatric Security Review Board’s decision to approve Smith’s release has ignited a firestorm of criticism, particularly from Republican lawmakers who view it as a dangerous precedent. The victim’s family has also voiced their concerns, questioning the wisdom of releasing someone with such a violent history back into society.

CT is officially trending…. for all the wrong reasons ~ yet again! @CTGOP @CTCentinal @kateinthemix @ThisRepubGirl @CMBornFree @MonaColwell @KristiTalmadge @TonyDeAngelo7 @GeorgeColli @JCherrySparks @ctltribune https://t.co/DPHCa77yKH

— TeamRealityCT 💜🐭 (@TeamRealityCT) February 23, 2025

Medical Professionals Cite Progress, Critics Fear Public Risk

Forensic psychiatrists involved in Smith’s case have testified to his significant improvement. Dr. Caren Teitelbaum, a key figure in Smith’s treatment, described him as a positive influence within the hospital setting. “To quote the director there, he is a joy. He is considered a support to the other people there. Once he was stable, he was a really calming presence for other patients,” Dr. Teitelbaum stated.

However, this assessment has done little to allay the fears of critics. GOP lawmakers have been particularly vocal in their opposition, labeling the decision as “outrageous” and “mind-boggling.” They argue that the release of such a dangerous individual poses an unacceptable risk to public safety.

Strict Conditions and Ongoing Monitoring

The terms of Smith’s release are far from a complete return to society. Initially, he will only be granted day passes on hospital grounds, with the potential for supervised off-site visits if he continues to show improvement. The release comes with stringent conditions, including ongoing treatment and close supervision.

“How do we really know he’s not going to do this again?” said Talitha Frazier, sister-in-law of Smith’s victim, Angel Gonzalez.

Medical professionals have emphasized that Smith’s stability is contingent on his continued medication regimen. They warn that any discontinuation of his prescribed medications could potentially make him a danger to society once again. This caveat has done little to reassure critics, who argue that the risk is simply too high.

A Divisive Decision with Far-Reaching Implications

The case of Tyree Smith has reignited debates about the effectiveness of psychiatric rehabilitation and the rights of victims’ families. While some view his release as a testament to the potential for mental health recovery, others see it as a dangerous gamble with public safety.

“This terrible decision puts public safety in jeopardy and is yet another terrible message to send to CT violent crime victims and their families. This person should never be out. We are dumbfounded at this injustice. In what universe is this OK?” asked Republican state senators Heather Somers, Paul Cicarella, Henri Martin, and Stephen Harding.

As Connecticut grapples with this controversial decision, the case serves as a stark reminder of the complex challenges facing our justice and mental health systems. The coming months will likely see continued debate and scrutiny as Smith begins his closely monitored transition back into society.